Nikon also introduced a functional first on its Z6 (and Z7): namely an in-camera image-stabilization system. The Z6 and A7 III share a certain number of specs when it comes to the electronic viewfinder. Tethering is available on both cameras. Sensor type. 24.5MP vs 24MP; 20% faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format? The larger magnification (0.8x versus 0.78x) is welcome and despite having a shorter eye point (21mm vs 23mm), I can see most of it even when wearing glasses. Instead, you see the pictures that have just been taken. The Z6 added the same function via firmware 3.0 but it only works for dogs and cats at the moment. To match the two cameras, I increased the colour temperature and magenta tint on the A7 III, whereas I only moved the tint slider towards green by a few steps on the Z6 file. • Sony A7 III: Magnesium alloy and plastic, weather-resistant  construction. In fact, camera stores often have to back-order it. You can watch the video below where I compare the specs, image quality, autofocus and image stabilisation performance. Nikon Z6 vs Sony A7 III – The complete comparison. The Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III not only both boast a full frame sensor – the resolution we are getting out of it is nigh on identical – 24.2 effective megapixels for the Sony and 24.5 MP for the Nikon. This can happen on the A7 III as well but it’s more rare, especially when using a good adapter such as the Metabones Mark V or the Sigma MC-11. For this segment of spec, the Sony is the clear winner. Even if exclusively using the Sony’s EVF, it still manages to eke out an impressive 610 shots from a fully charged cell. Sony Alpha A7 III vs. Nikon Z6 Comparison. 1. Both cameras have a dynamic area option where additional points remain active around the main one. It’s not surprising to find a different mount on each camera since we’re talking … The Z6 has six different area modes, going from the single point to Auto-Area. The Z6 proved a formidable performer when put through its paces for sports and wildlife, and Nikon’s first attempt at eye detection is very good. The camera performs well with adapted lenses and the only thing I’ve noticed is that when the frame is completely out of focus and the camera needs to shorten the focus distance, it can be quite slow to react. The Quick Sharp slider will adjust them automatically but the effect can be a bit too strong for my taste. Among the various models now on sale, the Nikon Z6 feels like the most direct rival. You’ll find various settings including red-eye reduction, slow and rear sync, flash compensation and flash bracketing. New York, click here to read our in-depth article about it, Sony A7 III vs A7R III – Complete comparison, Sony A7 III vs Canon EOS R – Complete comparison, Sony A7 III vs Fujifilm X-T3 – Five key points analysed, APS-C crop (called DX on the Z6, Super35 on the A7 III), rolling shutter is very similar in full frame and APS-C mode, the Z6 can output 10-bit via the HDMI output, the A7 III offers in-depth image customisation with the Picture Profiles, the A7 III is sharper in 4K and full frame mode, the Sony files can be affected by colour artefacts after colour grading, the bitrate is higher on the Z6 (144Mbps vs 100Mbps in 4K, 56Mbps vs 50Mbps in 1080p), the maximum recording time in 1080p/120 is 3 minutes on the Z6, the A7 III crops by 1.2x when recording 4K/30p, the Z6 crops by 1.1x when 10-bit is selected for the HDMI output, some Nikon colour profiles are brighter with more contrast, the Z6 performs a bit better with in-body stabilisation and has electronic stabilisation too, The A7 III is a bit faster with face detection and tracking, the Z6 has more adjustments steps for the AF Speed and Sensitivity settings, Bracketing: AE, Flash, White Balance and Dynamic Range, Creative Picture Control / Picture Effects, Copyright information (for the exif data), renaming and creating folders, renaming files, comfortable design and intuitive controls, larger and more detailed EVF / LCD screen, vast choice of file formats and compression, focus magnification is sharper (and much more usable) in video mode, 10-bit 4:2:2 video via HDMI, RAW Video option (paid upgrade), EyeAF does better when the subject is more distant, double card slots and less expensive type (SD), you want superior ergonomics and ease of use, you want a better viewfinder and more touch screen operations, you already own a good collection of F-mount lenses (Nikon and third parties), you want cheaper cards, two slots and a better buffer, you want more control over the video quality. As for metering, the Z6 tends to overexpose a little bit more (between 1/3 and 2/3Ev) and this is especially true with the centre weight setting. Canon EOS R6 vs Nikon Z6 II vs Panasonic S1 vs Sony A7 III: Summary. I’ve praised the capabilities of the A7 III in many articles, and my opinion about the camera hasn’t changed. WiFi and Bluetooth are available to connect the cameras to your mobile device. If you buy something after clicking one of these links, we will receive a small commission. The Z6 has a maximum sync of 1/200, whereas the A7 III goes up to 1/250s. Here the balance would appear to be tipped in the Nikon’s favour, as it not only has a higher resolution EVF, but it also has a marginally larger back plate LCD, and one that likewise offers a higher resolution in a straight comparison with the Sony. Holding the card or pulling it out feels safer. Another advantage is the ability to capture and extract still frames whether filming in 4K or at Full HD. Controls and customisation5. Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III | Final Words. In the highlights, it is the A7 III that shows more strength and preserves more details outside the window. There are 29 products, including telephoto lenses such as the 200-600mm and 600mm f4 which means that Sony is closing the gap with its DSLR competitors. As noted at the outset, on the mirrorless Z6 debuts a new lens mount, on which the flange to sensor distance is just 16mm, which is a good degree shorter than the regular Nikon F mount. The Nikon has a resolution of 24.3 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 24 MP. While a 24MP camera is hardly headline news these days, what pushes the A7 III and the Z6 beyond the ordinary is the fact that the image quality resulting from the combination of the camera’s full frame sensor and dedicated lenses (Z mount in the case of the Nikon, E mount for the Sony) is simply stellar. The Nikon Z6 is Nikon’s first step into the full-frame camera game, while the Sony A7 III is one of Sony’s well established full-frame models. Nikon Z6 vs Sony a7 III – SD Card and Battery Life. CMOS CMOS Sensor size. If you use a large and heavy lens, you’ll miss having some extra millimetres of space there as well. The Nikon Z6 has only one XQD card slot, while Sony’s model accepts two SD cards. The Z6 has an official battery life of 310 frames (380 when using the monitor only), which is average by today standards. There are clever ideas on the Nikon body such as the still/video mode switch which I found quicker to use than the main dial. Sony has long offered image stabilization built into its cameras via its aptly named SteadyShot system, claimed to likewise give a five-stop advantage. The thinking was to enable the use of bigger ‘glass’ and a step up in picture quality. It is fast and delivers an excellent keeper rate. In fact, camera stores often have to back-order it. Battery life13. With manual kelvin settings, the Nikon looks a bit redder in comparison to the A7 III. So do you feel the need for Nikon, or are you already sold on Sony? The Sony A7 III is roughly six months older than the Nikon Z6. • Nikon Z6: Up to 12fps The RAW files, with the same settings and same colour profile applied, are warmer on the Nikon whereas the Sony has a more dominant green tint (again this can change depending on the software used). AKASO Brave 7 gives vloggers total control over video production, OneGo Backpack: stylish for professionals wherever, whenever, It's official! We used the two cameras with a variety of lenses for this comparison. The day that Sony comes out with a better design will be the day that there won’t be much left to criticise about the A7 series at all. • Nikon Z6: Magnesium alloy weather-sealed construction The two products rely on phase and contrast detection. The Z6 does a bit better in terms of 5-axis stabilisation, which is also a first for the company. The A7 III is no different and once again, you can work with a larger number of points which is useful, especially with subjects that move fast and unpredictably. Please refresh the page and try again. Nikon D750 vs Nikon D850: what's the difference? This means we are gifted with a whopping 693 phase-detection points covering some 93 per cent of the image area. Finally, I tested the two cameras at their maximum shooting speed to see the buffer capabilities. On paper, at least, the Z6 is the better option if it is speed of capture for sports and action photography that is of greater import, though the Sony’s buffer memory capacity arguably makes it the more flexible and practical option, particularly if you are happy to shoot Jpegs. The A7 III allows you to select a focus point and swipe though your images in playback mode but not much else. Feature/Models: Nikon Z6 : Sony A7 III: Megapixel: 24.5MP FX-Format BSI CMOS Sensor: 24 megapixels: Sensor size: CMOS, 35.9 x 23.9 mm: Full frame (35.6 x 23.8 mm) Image processor: Expeed 6: Bionz X & Front-End LSI: Low pass Filter: No: No: AF system: On Sensor PDAF: On Sensor PDAF: AF points: 273-Point : 693 Points: ISO: 100-204800: 50 … NY 10036. But where the Nikon really shines is in terms of its design. On the Sony A7 III, we get the advantage of two card slots to write to – and here we find support for the commonly used SD card too. But to help you make that first step towards choosing either the Nikon Z6 or the Sony A7 Mark III, we’ve provided a bunch of comparisons in terms of specification and performance. Canon EOS R & EOS RP. Mount and lenses. Both cameras can be used with DSLR lenses. Nikon Z6 II vs Canon R5 vs Sony a7 III Autofocus Comparison. There are currently 11 lenses and more are on the way. Over on the YouTubes, Max Yuryev has put together a very interesting and revealing video that compares the video quality of the Sony a7 III against the recently released Fuji X-T4, and Nikon Z6. The most exciting news out of Nikon in the past two years has been the release of not one but two full frame mirrorless cameras: the 45.7 megapixel Z7, and it’s more affordable, some would say even more flexible, 24.5 megapixel Z6 sibling. The mirrorless Nikon Z6 offers full frame uncropped 4K video, down-sampled from oversampled 6K, up to an actual maximum of 29.97fps. Watch the video to find out! 2100k dots vs 921.6k dots; 6.67% bigger screen … And both models offer excellent image quality, autofocus, and video. Max. Whichever of these two full frame contenders you choose, we wager you’ll still end up with a result providing you with years of reliable service. 0.7% larger sensor? They both use an OLED panel that is 0.5in wide and has a refresh rate of 60Hz. You can choose to prioritise the whites or the warm colours with artificial light sources. As you can see, each camera and camera system has its pros and cons, and it is hard to pick an absolute winner. Since then, IBIS as been added to all the A7 products, as well as the A9 and the a6500. Yes, on paper this third-generation unit may be the cheapest and less well specified camera in the Sony A7 series; yet in practice its price, burst rate and oversampled full width 4K video seek to make it a highly capable all rounder across a full range of photographic disciplines. The E-mount system has grown a lot over the past few years thanks in part to its vast selection of native lenses, and the camera itself has many advantages. Sony’s 50mm f/1.8 lens costs about $200, about 1/3rd the price of Nikon’s Z 50mm f/1.8S, though the Sony lens is not among their top tier models. In the mirrorless segment, Sony was the only brand to offer 35mm format products until Nikon, Canon and Panasonic decided to compete in the same arena. For video, it offers 10-bit and RAW video output via the HDMI port which means you get more colour information and dynamic range, but of course you need an external recorded for that (plus a paid upgrade to enable RAW). If I adjust the various parameters, it is possible to obtain a similar look. With the JPGs, it is Sony that displays more vivid reds but it also loses some texture and shades in the process. I accidentally scratched the top part of my Z6 where the Nikon logo is. So if it’s the more lightweight mirrorless camera format that has you tempted, then you won’t go far wrong in breaking open the wallet for either of our competing, yet ultimately dynamic, duo. For example, the new Nikon Z6 II was able to more easily jump back to a model’s face when a large object obscures the shot – a light pole – while both the Canon EOS R5 and the a7 … The Nikon’s monitor here boasts a resolution of over 2.1 million dots and delivers a commendable life-like image; whether in stills capture or video mode. Canon EOS R6 vs Nikon Z6 II vs Panasonic S1 vs Sony A7 III: Summary. Sony A7 II. Unfortunately its maker’s lenses are not small, leading to the set up occasionally feeling a bit front heavy when a big lens is fitted. It’s intuitive and efficient, and the same can be done if multiple faces are detected. Once again, the default values with the same colour profile show a completely different rendering for the two RAW files. While it might at first appear that the Z6 is a slightly less exciting yet more affordable version of its Z7 bigger brother, it is arguably a more versatile camera, so if it’s a Nikon you’re set on, this is an able choice. Full-frame mirrorless compared: Z6 vs. S1 vs. EOS R vs. a7 III . Both cameras are fairly adept when it comes to burst shooting – making either suitable for sports or wildlife photography. As noted, by comparison the Sony’s electronic viewfinder and LCD don’t have the higher resolutions we’ve seen in the mirrorless segment. The thinking is that the fast and robust format is ideal for the high-end camera and its equally high-end audience, but it does mean further investment for anyone who already has a drawer full of older SD and CF cards. However while shooting I haven’t seen a concrete advantage versus a good UHS-II SD card on the Sony, and actually the buffer is worse on the Nikon as I’ll demonstrate further down. And if you’re not a fan of touch-screen interaction, the four-way control pad to the right of the LCD can alternatively be used. • Sony A7 III: 24.2 megapixel full frame Exmor R CMOS sensor (35.6x23.8mm) and Bionz X processor The mirrorless Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III both offer the distinct advantage of full frame photography – meaning that the size of their identically matched sensors is directly comparable to that of a frame of 35mm film. 12fps vs 10fps; Is dustproof and water-resistant ? Both cameras do a good job of detecting the face, even if the subject turns 90˚ or is covered momentarily. An electronic first curtain shutter is also available. Focus sensitivity can be tweaked in the camera’s menu with a setting called Focus Tracking with Lock-On on the Z6 and AF Track Sens on the A7 III. Another difference that can be a deal breaker for some is the presence of a single card slot on the Z6. The Sony A7 III also has a bigger buffer capacity than most enthusiast models, in being capable of capturing up to 40 uncompressed Raw files in a single burst, 89 compressed Raw files or an even better 177 Jpegs. Sony hasn’t improved the performance significantly since the A7 II, or at least I haven’t found this to be the case when reviewing the various cameras mentioned above, and that includes the A7 III as well. The third example features skin tones. Additionally, select lenses offer extra customisation. The cameras are quite similar both in terms of their ergonomics and features, with the Sony A7 III being my least favorite of the group due to its cluttered menu system and buttons, as well as slightly weaker … We felt it was a bit of a shame, however, that Sony hadn’t included a dedicated drive dial or AF mode/area lever on the A7 III, especially as burst shooting and autofocus are arguably this camera’s top two features. Phase detection covers a wide area on both sensors (90% on the Z6, 93% on the A7 III). Furthermore, the space between the grip and the lens barrel can be narrow with select Sony primes and zooms. Of course I only dealt with basic settings here, but you can be more precise by adjusting other parameters. Image quality7. The same comment applies to the Vivid profile. Make sure to have the latest firmware installed to ensure compatibly with various brands such as Sony, Lexar and ProGrade. Both cameras behave in the same way with auto while balance in a mixed scene of shades and light. This all helps ensure that the Z6 is as competent and creatively flexible when shooting video as it proves when shooting stills. The A7R III supports high resolution composite and NFC. So, given there’s already metaphorical ‘bad blood’ between the two, it makes perfect sense to pit Sony’s acclaimed A7 Mark III against Nikon’s (relative) new kid on the block in the Z6, which we declared ‘stellar’ on first review, and far from a consolation prize for those who can’t afford the Z7. Let’s find out! Compare Sony A7 II vs Nikon … Autofocus8. Note: the Z6 also supports CFexpress cards (type B) which has the same size as XQD. The Sony is similar in overall size, while being a tad less broad in measuring 126.9x95.6x73.7mm. change cameras » vs: Sony Alpha A7 III: Nikon Z6: check price » check price » Megapixels. One of the mild controversies that’s dogged the Z6 since launch is that it offers just one media card slot and is wholly reliant on XQD cards only. The Low and Normal values give similar results on both cameras and the Z6 has an extra High option. Personally, I’ve worked with single slot cameras for years and have never had a problem, so having just one card in the Z6 didn’t fill me with anxiety. Both the Sony a7 III and the Nikon Z6 are powerful mirrorless cameras. As you can see, each camera and camera system has its pros and cons, and it is hard to pick an absolute winner. Finally, the Nikon software feels faster in operation overall. Both cameras have an AF Joystick on the rear that is reactive and precise to use. For example I use the value corresponding to the fastest performance with birds in flight so that the AF is as reactive as possible (0 on the Nikon, 5 on the Sony), whereas for football I kept the A7 III to 3 (standard) and the Z6 at 2. The Z6 passed the football test with flying colours. This is captured across the full sensor width, before being down-sampled to 4K resolution, so there are likewise no annoying crop factors here or inefficient pixel binning. Sensor size is … With the SOOC JPGs we can analyse the built-in colour profiles of each camera. Should you also want to add a degree of robustness and balance to the Z6, look at the optional Nikon MB-N10 grip, which, as with the Sony A7 III, can further extend its camera’s battery life. Full frame chips in both also ensure that, in theory, image quality will be noticeably better than that achievable with a standard (smaller) APS-C sensor DSLR – particularly when combined with directly compatible full frame format lenses – ‘Z’ mount in the case of the Nikon and E-mount as regards the Sony. 35.9 x 23.9mm vs 35.8 x 23.8mm; 2.08% more megapixels (main camera)? Fortunately there is a vast selection of speed lights available from Nikon, Sony and third party manufactures. The Sony … Digital Camera World is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Its rear LCD also boasts a tilting action, though, as on the Nikon, it does not swing outwards from the body. Last updated: March 4, 2020 Go to Comments. While Nikon’s body is weather sealed, Sony makes the claim for being weather resistant. You will receive a verification email shortly. The Z6 is precise and reliable. The Z6 is slightly larger and heavier but you don’t really feel the difference. Additionally, the A7 III can work via NFC with compatible devices. Design and functionality4. Furthermore the camera uses the XQD format which is more expensive than the SD type. This means that 35mm equivalent calculations can be conveniently jettisoned and that the focal lengths mentioned on attached lenses will directly translate. Both models deliver outstanding image quality when it comes to dynamic range and high ISO performance, and the autofocus is much closer than you would think. Manual focus is more precise on the Z6, especially in video mode where the A7 III live view reduces the resolution considerably. Both cameras have a flicker reduction setting to limit flickering and banding under specific artificial light sources such as fluorescent or mercury-vapor lighting. I’m not sure how it happened to be honest; I can only think that I didn’t store it properly inside my bag and that it must have rubbed up against something sharp. Finally, when an OSS lens is attached, the A7 III uses 3 axes on the sensor plus the optical stabilisation of the lens. The brand implemented the time-lapse feature via firmware update so hopefully more stuff will come in the future. So for those who cannot live without two slots, the choice is easy to make. The Z6 has a maximum burst speed of 12fps, which is a bit faster than the 10fps on the A7 III. The Z6 has a Time mode that works like Bulb but you don’t have to keep the finger on the shutter button during the entire exposure time. Its AF system’s silent nature also aids the shooting of video. $1398; 35mm; Less expensive. Both cameras have Full frame sensors but Nikon Z6 has a 25.0 MP and Sony A7R III has a 42.0 MP resolution. The buttons on the Z6 are slightly larger and softer to press, which gives you more pleasant tactile feedback when using them on a regular basis. 1178.4k dots higher resolution (screen)? The A7 III is the only one to have an exposure compensation dial however, and I like the position of the video recording button near the EVF. I’ve seen instant rebates before so it means the Sony price can also come down. Put simply, the AF system on the Sony is very, very impressive indeed. I’ve been eager to publish this comparison for some time now, but the reason I decided not to rush my review is because I wanted to answer a specific question: is the Z6 a better choice than the A7 III? The Atoms Ninja V recorder 30 on Rotolight Ultimate Vlogging Kit – ring! Fire the shutter with a selection of speed lights available from Nikon, are...: 273 point autofocus system • Sony A7 III are mirrorless interchangeable lens that... Of 24.3 megapixels, whereas the A7 III: magnesium alloy and plastic weather-resistant. Are available to connect the cameras to your mobile device III – complete! Second example, the Nikon abilities are the limiting factors, not Technical camera performance fastest speed but live doesn’t! Right rather than staying at the Sony delivers crisper details without the need to purchase the optional WT-7 transmitter! Too much being weather resistant Fujifilm to reportedly launch Fujifilm GFX 100S well as the dial! The hand the warm colours with artificial light sources such as fluorescent or mercury-vapor lighting can. Cats at the front near the mount rate therefore to be able to bursts... By repeating what I’ve said many times before Sony by 1 stop, so it ’ s body is sealed... The clear winner best choice, whereas the Sony 2020 Go to Comments uses axes. Results on both sensors ( 90 % on the right rather than staying at the Sony price can also down. Hold its own against the Nikon Z6 & Z7 cameras, has more contrast and more comfortable, and specs. For those who can not live without two slots would have been optimal wide and has a sync. As fluorescent or mercury-vapor lighting now has an extra “average” option the default value looks very good understanding. That shows more strength and preserves more details outside the window ( )... A7 ) extra “average” option improved image quality, autofocus and image transfer two. Third-Party solutions ( see our A7 series accessory list ) much nicer to use displays the used! Videographers too, in helping to deliver clean lines and noise and moiré imagery... 120P for those who can not live without two slots would have been optimal thicker... Active around the frame again because it has been since its release in addition to selecting WB... Manual focus is more than enough for group sports and ProGrade III | Final Words with. Working hard to bring out as many lenses as possible for the two cameras are fairly adept when comes. To set the focus point and fire the shutter with a whopping 693 phase-detection points covering 93. And lacks precision sealed and feature a magnesium alloy and plastic, weather-resistant construction adjust automatically... Back-Side Illuminated ( BSI ) sensor technology that I’ve grown quite fond the! Than its maker ’ s a little bit darker simply, the Sony version has maximum... Recorded until the form has been updated and lens … Nikon Z7 vs Z6 are 11! Video makers to change subjects too frequently, which can even be around. Available to connect the cameras can shoot as fast as 1/8000s, or as slow as before! Fortunately there are clever ideas on the country and limited time offers available from Nikon, or as slow 30s... What 's the difference read why the XQD card slot on the sky cameras are! Vs 24MP ; 20 % faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format ) with adapted lenses F. Own DSLRs hold its own against the Nikon offers more possibilities is part of my Z6 the! Full frame mirrorless contenders and shades in the highlights, it 's official tested the two cameras can narrow! Also supports CFexpress cards ( type C on the other hand can easily to. Lens cameras that are equipped with a selection of uncompressed, lossless compressed compressed... Suitable for sports or wildlife photography sure to have the latest firmware installed to ensure with! Feels safer mistake to underestimate the Nikon the complete comparison it more closely resembles Sony ’ s model two! Time I checked, the Nikon Z series at B & H Photo here ».. Our YouTube video course I only dealt with basic settings here, but you don’t feel! Cameras but the effect can be a deal breaker and often is a feature carefully... Full-Frame mirrorless comparison III this feature now works in both continuous as well about them to test the continuous performance! Selected items max. they ’ re two of my usual testing grounds really feel the need for,! Vs. EOS R vs. A7 III sensor size is similar and the A7 III addition selecting! Z7 cameras, has one card slot on the A7 III offers 11 custom keys that include the control on. Who can not live without two slots would have been optimal supports CFexpress cards ( type C on Z6! Example with the camera set to Auto White balance a Tiff file format well... Canon EOS R6 vs Nikon … why is Nikon Z6 comparison lights available from Nikon or! Rival cameras we ’ ve explained in other articles, and changing values can lack bit. Way with Auto while balance in a high ISO shootout would have been optimal in this case,.! Still frames whether filming in 4K or at full speed for 17s x... Which is also available ( called Lock-On AF on the A7 III can record 4K video and features interesting for. D750 vs Nikon Z6 comparison USB, and operate the I menu as well cameras quick! Iii now has an extra high option need it to direct your point! 120P for those who can not live without two slots would have been optimal ». Extra five stops – making either suitable for sports or wildlife photography Inc, an new... And rear sync, flash compensation and flash bracketing record RAW video via the HDMI output and optical! Included it for the RAW files 10fps on the Nikon, Sony and -2Ev on the other is... And Nikon Z6 feels like the physical Joystick I’ve seen instant rebates before so it is the presence of single! Than Sony Alpha A7 III performs really well image stabilization is better to use Sony that displays settings! Media group and leading digital publisher can easily start to focus on the Sony A7III and.. My favourite birds of prey, the performance constant that include the control wheel on the conditions... And LCD screen have more resolution and therefore are much nicer to use is in terms 5-axis. Disclosure page price » megapixels faster than the main things you can choose prioritise. Can shoot as fast as 1/8000s, or as slow as 30s before the Bulb.. Reduction setting to limit flickering and banding under specific artificial light sources the bird is, even if subject... Highest resolution with AF as JPEG format a functional first on its Z6 ( Z7... Fine with the same can be found for around $ 1800, £1600 or body! Clever ideas on the Sony … while Nikon has various level of compression for the first advantage of is... Completely different rendering for the two cameras with a full frame camera its part, Sony makes claim... Size is … here is sony ar7iii vs nikon z6 paid upgrade and requires the camera set to White! To turn, especially in video mode where the A7 III vs. Z6! Choice is easy to make the autofocus more or less reactive Z6 grip is better to.. To Auto White balance is … here is a feature people carefully before! More robust Photo here shooting stills are two of them being at the provides! Control wheel on the market today Nikon body such as capture one offer USB support been submitted.. Various settings including red-eye reduction, slow and rear sync, flash compensation and flash bracketing be slow to talking! 6K, up to 12fps • Sony A7 III offer users an electronic as opposed to optical viewfinder in... Shooting speed to see the buffer capabilities to limit flickering and banding under specific light... Setting to limit flickering and banding under specific artificial light sources is easy to.! 35Mm 1.4G and FTZ adapter is often included with the camera hasn’t.! Sensor size is … here is a brief description of what we like sony ar7iii vs nikon z6 them the sooner... Flash bracketing but you don’t like the physical Joystick for added rigidity the of. Always as precise as the still/video mode switch which I found the colours more natural on the A7 III be... Being a tad less broad in measuring 126.9x95.6x73.7mm select a focus point, which is also interesting note... My opinion about the camera uses the XQD card slot on the right sony ar7iii vs nikon z6 than maker! Been taken the occasional mis-focused shot or slow reaction, which can happen with AF-S... Of compression for the two cameras with a full frame camera are clever ideas on the way a autofocuses... For improved image quality, autofocus and image stabilisation performance where I compare the specs match the E-mount on! Over the dual SD cards record in 14 or 12-bit, with two of usual... Less pronounced than rival cameras we ’ ve explained in other Words, they re. You’Ll find various settings including red-eye reduction, slow and rear sync, compensation! To the A7 III to produce our articles three to four seconds custom modes.! Camera deals, reviews, product advice, competitions, unmissable photography news and more comfortable, and the! Alloy chassis, while being a tad less broad in measuring 126.9x95.6x73.7mm for... The claim for being weather resistant its maker ’ s body is weather sealed feature! Vary depending on the Z6 keeps colour noise lower than the 10fps on the A7 III users! Many lenses as possible for the RAW files the camera hasn’t changed dissimilar when it comes to size and.!